By
State Supreme Courts Take Up COVID-19 Vaccine Cases
https://ift.tt/JbAFtra
from The Epoch Times:
One case involves a minor who was injected even though parents did not want the child to receive the vaccine.
Two state supreme courts are considering whether workers who administered COVID-19 vaccines to minors without parental consent should be shielded by a federal law.
The North Carolina Supreme Court agreed to take up an appeal from Tanner Smith, one of the minors, and his mother, according to an order dated May 23.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Tanner, who was 14 at the time, went to a clinic at a school in his district, Guilford County Schools, in 2021 to receive a COVID-19 test. Instead, his mom and stepfather learned later, he was injected with a COVID-19 vaccine even after he told workers at the clinic he didn’t want it.
Emily Happel, Tanner’s mother, and the boy sued the district and the organization that was running the clinic, alleging battery and violations of constitutional rights.
A trial court ruled against them, though, finding that the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) provides immunity to the workers.
The act, signed in 2005 by then-President George W. Bush, conveys immunity to administrators of covered vaccines except in cases of “willful misconduct.”
news
via SGT Report https://ift.tt/UZ5tpo1
June 3, 2024 at 02:00AM
June 3, 2024 at 02:06AM
via Comments on: State Supreme Courts Take Up COVID-19 Vaccine Cases https://ift.tt/JbAFtra